ProShares UltraShort DUG Lawsuit
Gilman and Pastor, LLP filed a class action lawsuit on October 23, 2009 in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York, on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired shares in the UltraShort
Oil and Gas fund (the “DUG Fund”), an exchange-traded fund (“ETF”) offered by ProShares Trust (“ProShares”),
pursuant or traceable to ProShares’ false and misleading Registration Statement, Prospectuses, and Statements of
Additional Information (collectively, the “Registration Statement”) issued in connection with shares of the DUG Fund
(the “Class”). The Class is seeking to pursue remedies under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the
“Securities Act”).ex elit sed dolor aute lorem consequat.
The complaint names ProShares, ProShare Advisors LLC, SEI Investments Distribution Co., Michael L. Sapir, Louis
M. Mayberg, Russell S. Reynolds, III, Michael Wachs, and Simon D. Collier, as defendants (collectively,
“Defendants”). ProShares sells its Ultra and UltraShort ETFs as “simple” directional plays. As alleged, the products
are defective and do not perform in accordance with reasonable investor expectations.
The DUG Fund is one of ProShares’ UltraShort ETFs. The
DUG Fund seeks investment results that correspond to twice
the inverse (–200%) daily performance of the Dow Jones
U.S. Oil and Gas Index (“DJOGI”). Accordingly, the DUG
Fund is supposed to deliver double the inverse return of the
DJOGI, which fell approximately 37 percent from January 2,
2008 through December 31, 2008, ostensibly creating a
profit for investors who anticipated a decline in the U.S. Oil
and Gas market. In other words, the DUG Fund should have
appreciated by over 74 percent during this period. However,
the DUG Fund fell approximately 30 percent during this
period.
Plaintiff investors allege ProShares violated the Securities
Act by failing to disclose risks to ordinary and conservative
investors, including:
• If DUG Fund shares were held for a time period
longer than one day, the likelihood of
catastrophic losses was huge
• The extent to which performance of the DUG
Fund would inevitably diverge from the
performance of the DJOGI—i.e., the
overwhelming probability, if not certainty, of
Plaintiff in the DUG Action seeks to recover damages on
behalf of all Class members who purchased or otherwise
acquired shares of ProShares DUG. If you purchased or
otherwise acquired ProShares DUG shares, and either lost
money on the transaction or still hold the shares, you may
wish to join in the action to serve as lead plaintiff. In order to
do so, you must meet certain requirements set forth in the
applicable law and file appropriate papers no later than
November 23, 2009.
You are entitled to recover for losses in ProShares
UltraShort DUG Oil and Gas Fund for a Limited Time
On behalf of ProShares DUG investors, we are seeking to recover damages on behalf of all Class
members who purchased or otherwise acquired shares of ProShares DUG.
Why Gilman and Pastor, LLP?
Gilman and Pastor is a national litigation firm specializing in securities litigation, consumer class
actions and complex business litigation. For 30 years our attorneys have recovered more than a
billion dollars on behalf of our clients.
Gilman and Pastor’s managing partner, Kenneth G. Gilman has extensive experience over the last
25 years in recovering funds related to fraudulent Ponzi schemes. In 1985, Mr. Gilman was
appointed by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, as the Equity
Receiver, to marshall and recover funds arising out of the massive Ponzi scheme known as the
Intercontinental Commodity Pool Fraud. Mr. Gilman pursued and recovered assets for investors
from all responsible parties, including the firm’s auditors. He also worked with the Department of
Justice, international authorities in Switzerland and the Cayman Islands to penetrate bank
secrecy laws and locate funds to which the investors were entitled. He also worked with the U.S.
Prosecutors to make certain that those who perpetrated the securities fraud were sentenced to
jail for their crimes.
From 1982 through 1985, Mr. Gilman also represented the Receiver in the massive nationwide
Lloyd Carr Ponzi scheme. As part of that representation, he pursued responsible third parties as
special counsel for the Department of Justice in Massachusetts Federal Court and in litigation
nationwide.
Our firm is committed to representing investors who have been defrauded by ProShares
and all other responsible parties, including but limited to: any brokerage firms or
financial advisors who recommended the ProShares investment. Please fill out the form
for our investigation.
Privacy Policy: Gilman and Pastor maintains the strict and confidential privacy of your message. We do not transfer
your personal information, including your email address, to any third party. Information entered in the form will be
used solely for informational purposes to assist in your case investigation.